National Catholic Reporter (Newspaper):
Article about Terry Rakolta's Fight
Last update November 8, 1999
Back to the Bundyology Homepage
Back to «Articles and Interviews»
As posted by Carolyn Crapo at alt.tv.mwc on October 4, 1999. Completed by Andreas Carl.
The National Catholic Reporter, May 19, 1989.
Threat to censor broad snipes and brights stars
By DICK RYAN
Not long ago, an irate housewife bombarded televison advertisers with letters
excoriating one particular program, and many advertisers took fright. I've been
waiting for the other shoe to drop, for the next irate housewife.
When Terry Rakolta raised her tiny voice and complained about the lecherous
dialogue in the new sitcom "Married... with Children," it brought a lump to my throat. A new
American folk heroine was born and, once again, one giant step was taken for the
little guy. An obscure Midwestern housewife taking censorship out of the
churches and bringing it right into the kitchen - what could be more true blue?
When Rakolta first appeared in the morning headlines denouncing the new program as
lewd, indecent and demeaning to women, advertisers such as Procter & Gamble and
McDonald's trampled over each other to distance their ads from the program and
appease this one-woman juggernaut from Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. In his
heydey Cardinal Francis Spellman couldn't have terrified so many, so quickly, so
And yet, when the smoke, and ratings, settled, Rakolta had achieved just the opposite
of what she had hoped to accomplish. Curious television viewers, those little
devils, thinking they had missed something, turned on their sets, and the
ratings for "Married... with Children" revived quite nicely. Many of the viewers - average, ordinary
husbands and wives raising families and striving valiantly to pay the bills,
discovered they were watching, well, themselves, of at least people they knew or
knew about in the neighborhood.
It was not the Cosbys or the all too pretious adventurs of the Brady Bunch, resurrected,
or one of those too cute, carefully concocted "family series" that are as charming and endearing
as one of those commercials on constipation. It was, for the most part, two people, husband and wife,
Al and Peggy Bundy, talking about some of the things that many ordinary, canonized, unpretentiously,
noncelibate married couples are wont to discuss during the course of a routine day, or night,
and that occasionally, er, uh, does indeed include some passing, peripheral illusion of sex.
Rakolta is probably the ideal wife-mother-crusader, but she has all the natural
instincts of most censors. She condemns too eagerly. There is no compromise or
middle ground in her all-or-nothing anathemas. She doesn't think the rest of
humanity should watch, or enjoy, what she doesn't like.
If she were a social worker, most American families would be evicted from their couch near the
television set. If she were a teacher, most well-adjusted and quite happy husbands and wives would
be sent to the back of their living rooms.
To her credit, however, and unlike certain prestigous Catholic critics who
bragged that they never saw "The Last Temptation of Christ" or read "The Satanic
Verses" but whacked them anyway, Rakolta has at least watched "Married... with Children".
What Rakolta has obviously not watched, however, are a few average American families.
And what she does not seem to want to admit is that the conversations in many
homes, proper and congenial as they might be, do not generally sound like the
Little Sisters of the Poor at meditation. Most husbands and wives, in the few
moments they can get together, do not generally sound like the soundtrack from
"Bambi" or the Trapp Family Singers.
Admittedly, a visit to the Bundy home isn't exactly a journey thru the Sistine
Chapel. But it is a slice of American life that has a right to take its place
alongside "60 Minutes" or "Murder She Wrote" or any other Sunday-night
This is not meant to suggest that Al and Peggy Bundy are the second coming of the Walton family.
Al's idea of exercise is carrying a six-pack to his favorite spot, in front of television,
and Peg's no slouch when it comes to double entendres and the kind of conversation that is not
generally a staple of the Disney channel. No Christopher awards this year for Al and Peg.
And yet, dare we presume that Rakolta is perfectly capable of getting on her feet and
turning to the program of her choice? Nobody is constrained to watch the Bundys
or forced to listen to the kind of dumb dialogue that the nicer people of this
world may find, let's say, gauche. But neither should anyone be deprived of the
opportunity to watch the antithesis of Robert Young and Jane Wyatt simply
because the Bundys are not the kind of folks Rakolta generally invites to her
There is one other thing. Crusader Rakolta complained that "Married... with Children"
is demeaning to women. Has this woman ever really watched television before? Does she watch
it now? Has she ever counted the ways many of the sitcoms (not to mention commercials)
go out of their way to portray men (and especially fathers) as blithering idiots?
The babbling father in "Family Ties" is a case in point. So is Roseanne's husband, who
seems to enjoy looking, and talking, like a jerk. So are Bob Newhart, Danny DeVito in the old
"Taxi" series and Dan Fielding in "Night Court," television's unchallenged dregs in male sleaze.
And if they're not bad enough, let me hasten to include those twin towers of American manhood
that are the fas-food version of Attila the Hun and the Ayatollah, Archie Bunker and J.R. Ewing.
Rakolta may have propelled more than one chancery chamber into gleeful excitement, inaugurating,
as she did, an approach that might well replace the traditional edict promulgated from on high
in pulpit, pastoral and diccesan press, condemning this or that film or book for salacious and
scandalous blah, blah and blah. Instead, canny prelates might henceforth enlist a cadre of rich
housewives in their diceses and unleash them, unmercifully against advertisers and sponsors,
politicians, nasty reporters, deadbeart parishioners - the sky's the limit.
There are probably a few fearful souls out there this very moment convulsed by the fear that another
Rakolta may ride into town an decree that programs depicting, smoking, baldness, overwight, freckles,
bad breath or a passion for chocolate are dangerous to your health and demeaning to humanity.
crusader Rakolta might do well to sublimate her bile and target some of the other
things on TV that perhaps more seriously require her vigilance and her
typewriter. News stories, for example, about America's continuing antipathy to
the homeless are more than lewd, while most stories about your run-of-the-mill
politician and his first-day-with-the-grand-jury are grossly indecent. And just
about any commercial, coaxing and lying and seductive, is arrogantly demeaning
to all of us. Even to Al and Peg Bundy."
Back to the top of this page
Back to «Articles and Interviews»
Back to the Bundyology Homepage
© Andreas Carl 1999